Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Hernandez-Benitez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
104 F. App'x 451
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose HERNANDEZ-BENITEZ, also known as Jose Feliz HernandezBenitez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-11306.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 18, 2004.
Marc Woodson Barta, Tamara Lynn Reno, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ira Raymond Kirkendoll, Federal Public Defender, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Hernandez-Benitez
104 F. App'x 451
Case Details
104 F. App'x 451
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!