75 F. App'x 685

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Paul HAWK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-30019.

D.C. No. CR-01-05218-RJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 2003.

Decided Sept. 19, 2003.

*686Bruce F. Miyake, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Miriam F. Schwartz, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tacoma, WA, Carlton Frederick Gunn, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and SHAPIRO,* Senior Judge.

MEMORANDUM**

Christopher Paul Hawk appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for second degree murder, because the sentencing judge upwardly departed from criminal history category IV to category V pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. We remand for resentencing to include specific findings supporting the upward departure; United States v. Carrillo-Alvarez, 3 F.3d 316, 324 (9th Cir.1993). See also United States v. Singleton, 917 F.2d 411 (9th Cir.1990).

The decision of the district court is

REMANDED for resentencing.

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

In my view, the findings at pages 43-46 of the sentencing transcript suffice.

United States v. Hawk
75 F. App'x 685

Case Details

Name
United States v. Hawk
Decision Date
Sep 19, 2003
Citations

75 F. App'x 685

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!