144 F. App'x 625

Douglas ASHBY; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. FARMERS GROUP, INC., Defendant—Appellee.

No. 03-35673.

D.C. No. CV-01-01446-AJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted on briefs March 8, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Steve D. Larson, Scott A. Shorr, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Schlachter, PC, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Barnes H. Ellis, James N. Westwood, Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before HUG, REINHARDT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment. The district court ruled that under the Fair Credit Reporting Act “the entity contracting with *626the policyholder is the only statutory ‘taker’ of adverse action” in cases in which it is alleged that an increased charge is contained in a policy of insurance. It also held that “internal decisions” that lead to an increase cannot constitute adverse actions. In light of Edo v. GEICO Casualty Co., — F.3d-, No. 04-35279, 2005 WL 2416126 (9th Cir.2005), we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc.
144 F. App'x 625

Case Details

Name
Ashby v. Farmers Group, Inc.
Decision Date
Aug 4, 2005
Citations

144 F. App'x 625

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!