32 Or. App. 161 573 P.2d 319

Argued December 22, 1977,

affirmed January 16, 1978

WATSON et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.

(No. CA 8995)

573 P2d 319

Michael J. Bird, Grants Pass, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Brown, Hughes, Bird & Lane, Grants Pass.

Jan P. Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A Redden, Attorney General, Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, and Melinda L. Bruce, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee, Buttler and Joseph, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*163PER CURIAM.

The sole question in this case is whether there is substantial evidence supporting the finding of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission that petitioners, through an employe, sold an alcoholic beverage to a minor. While the evidence is not overwhelming, it is sufficient to support the finding.

Affirmed.

Watson v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
32 Or. App. 161 573 P.2d 319

Case Details

Name
Watson v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
Decision Date
Jan 16, 1978
Citations

32 Or. App. 161

573 P.2d 319

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!