175 A.D.2d 679

Morrison & Foerster, Respondent-Appellant, v First Empire Funding Corp., Appellant-Respondent.

— Order unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in requiring defendant to reimburse plaintiff for all future attorney’s fees and stenographic expenses as a condition of granting defendant’s cross motion to vacate the prior order of *680preclusion. The court has the ability to impose sanctions as a condition for vacating the default, but the sanctions imposed in this case are so open-ended and onerous that they will effectively deprive defendant of its ability to defend the action (see, Mairena v Charlemagne, 102 AD2d 814; Weinstein, Skoller & Kaye v Lynard Props., 79 AD2d 987; Montgomery Coal & Oil Co. v Fuss, 35 AD2d 817). Since an award of sanctions was appropriate in the circumstances of this case, we modify the court’s order to require defendant to pay plaintiff the sum of $1,000. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Hand, J. — Discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Den-man, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Morrison v. First Empire Funding Corp.
175 A.D.2d 679

Case Details

Name
Morrison v. First Empire Funding Corp.
Decision Date
Jul 12, 1991
Citations

175 A.D.2d 679

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!