Appellants’ efforts to settle the record without unnecessary printing, so as to raise the proper questions on appeal, have involved consultations and arrangements with the two other parties, including the corporation counsel of the city of New York, so that the delays hitherto are apparently excused. The motion to dismiss the appeal is' therefore denied, with liberty to renew if the appeal record is not arranged by stipulation or duly settled by Justice Tompkins within a reasonable time.
147 N.Y.S. 1098
In re BENSEL et al., Board of Water Supply.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
May 8, 1914.)
In the matter of the application and petition of John A. Bensel and others, constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to acquire real estate, etc. Southern Aqueduct Department, Section No. 15. Claim of Kensico Cemetery.
In re Bensel
147 N.Y.S. 1098
Case Details
147 N.Y.S. 1098
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!