Upon an examination of this case we find no errors. It involved a question of fact, which was fairly and fully submitted to the jury. They had a right to accept and believe the evidence of one side or the other. By their verdict it is clear they accepted the plaintiff’s version. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
25 N.Y.S. 1145
RAUBICHECK, Respondent, v. SNEDECOR, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General- Term.
October 20,1893.)
Action by Frank Raubicheck against William J. Snedecor.
Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and MCCARTHY, J.
Niles & Johnson, for appellant.
Hamilton R. Squier, for respondent.
Raubicheck v. Snedecor
25 N.Y.S. 1145
Case Details
25 N.Y.S. 1145
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!