4 Ohio Law Abs. 253

VOLRICH v. STATE

Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Butler Co.

No. 278.

Decided Nov. 2, 1925

Attorneys — Clinton H. Boyd, Middletown, for Volrich; Murphy & Joseph, Cincinnati, for State.

PER CURIAM

John Volrich was tried for illegal possession of intoxicating liquor. The trial court admitted in evidence a written report purporting to be a chemical analysis of certain wine charged to have been in possession of Volrich.

This ease was originally tried in the court of the Mayor of the Village of Monroe; error was prosecuted to the Butler Common Pleas, which affirmed the judgment of the mayor’s court. Error was again prosecuted to the Court of Appeals which held:

In view of the fact that no opportunity was given Volrich to cross-examine the chemist making the analysis, admission of the report was prejudicial error.

Judgment reversed.

Volrich v. State
4 Ohio Law Abs. 253

Case Details

Name
Volrich v. State
Decision Date
Nov 2, 1925
Citations

4 Ohio Law Abs. 253

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!