44 Cust. Ct. 332

No. 63769.

protest 58/10161 (Los Angeles).

Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L.A. and Sterling Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported! *333by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 332

Case Details

Name
Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1960
Citations

44 Cust. Ct. 332

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!