We think the act of April 10, 1900, 94 O. L. 116, relating to the listing for taxation and sale of forfeited lands, is constitutional. We see no reason why the state cannot dispose of land which has been forfeited to the state and remains unsold for want of bidders on such terms as to the general assembly seem best for the purpose of getting such property-back upon the live taxpaying duplicate.
15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 703
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — TAXATION.
[Hamilton (1st) Circuit Court,
1904.]
Giffen, Jellce and Swing, JJ.
State, ex rel. Smith, v. Eugene L. Lewis (Auditor).
Act Relatiug to Disposition or Foüfeited Land at Tax Sales Constitutional.
Tlie act of April 10,1900 (94 0.'L.116; See. 2907a Rev. Stat. et seq.), providing that where land offered at delinquent tax sale has not been sold for want of bidders and has been forfeited to the state for nonpayment of taxes, the county auditor shall, upon application of the owner of such land, readjust the taxes upon.the basis of the new decennial appraisement and make remittitur of a certain portion of the delinquent taxes in order to restore such lands to the live taxpaying duplicate, is constitutional.
Mandamus.
Stephen Coles and Franklin T. Cahill, for.relator.
Ampt, Ireton & Collins, contra.
State ex rel. Smith v. Lewis
15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 703
Case Details
15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 703
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!