Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Pinedo-Morales presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir.2008), which held that the disparity between sentences of defendants who can participate in a fast-track program and defendants who cannot is not “unwarranted” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
472 F. App'x 275
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis PINEDO-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-51013
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 17, 2010.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Pinedo-Morales
472 F. App'x 275
Case Details
472 F. App'x 275
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!