Holmes v. City of New London 140 Conn. 477

140 Conn. 477

Frances L. Holmes v. City of New London

Baldwin, Inglis, O’Sullivan, Quinlan and Wynne, Js.

Argued October 13

decided December 8, 1953

Edmund J. Eshenf elder, for the appellant (defendant).

Francis F. McGuire, with whom, on the brief, was Morgan K. McGuire, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Pee Curiam.

All of the claims raised on this appeal have basis only if the finding can be corrected. The *478conclusions of the trial court are legally drawn from the facts as it found them. To interfere with the conclusions would be to substitute different findings of fact. This cannot he done where there is evidence upon which reasoning minds might disagree. Here there is no basis for correcting the finding. This being so, the conclusions must stand.

There is no error.

Holmes v. City of New London
140 Conn. 477

Case Details

Name
Holmes v. City of New London
Decision Date
Dec 8, 1953
Citations

140 Conn. 477

Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Court
Connecticut Supreme Court

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!