In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & Somers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
67 N.Y.S. 1149
UNITED ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER CO., Respondent, v. GRAND CENTRAL REAL-ESTATE & INVESTMENT CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
December 31, 1900.)
Action by the United Electric Light & Power Company against Grand Central Real-Estate & Investment Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Foster & Speir, for appellant.
G. W. Simpson, for respondent.
United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Grand Central Real-Estate & Investment Co.
67 N.Y.S. 1149
Case Details
67 N.Y.S. 1149
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!