(Cf. Henning v. Henning, 272 App. Div. 676; De Robertis V. De Robertis, 254 App. Div. 811; Davis v. Davis, 195 App. Div. 430; Botway v. Botway, 273 App. Div. 948.) Although we do not regard such recitals as a determination of the issues involved, nor as binding in any respect on the court which will try the issues, they are redundant and unnecessary. (Cf. White v. White, 175 Misc. 66.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
279 A.D. 618
Mildred R. Reeve, Appellant, v. John H. Reeve, Jr., Respondent.
Reeve v. Reeve
279 A.D. 618
Case Details
279 A.D. 618
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!