While this case was not tried as closely as it might be, it seems to us to have been fairly left to the jury, and was one within their province for determination.
The question of the nature of the contract and what duties were devolved on, and expected to be performed by the plaintiff, was fully explained, and we do not see any reason for disturbing the verdict.
Judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Hascall and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.
Judgment'affirmed, with costs.