13 A.D.2d 893

(A) Betty W. Bramer, Appellant, v. James D. Bramer, Respondent. (B) John Chulick, Appellant, v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp., and Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company et al., Respondents. (Appeal as against D. L. & W. R. R. only.) (C) Joseph G. D’Aprile, Respondent, v. Buonomo’s, Incorporated, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (D) Charles T. Eppolito et al., Respondents, v. Charles E. Medlicott et al., Appellants. (E) Lohre Lyon et al., Appellants, v. E. Sherman Miller et al., Respondents. (F) Harold E. Polle, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent. (G) Alfred J. Zwick, Plaintiff, v. Jeannette E. Zwick, Defendant. (H) Joann V. Aylor et al., Plaintiffs, v. Newell L. Nussbaumer et al., Defendants, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Herbert F. Darling et al., Third-Party Defendants. (I) Dorothy J. Matteson, Plaintiff, v. City of Oswego et al., Defendants, and E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Herbert F. Darling et al., Third-Party Defendants. (J) Ray A. Lonthair, as Administrator, Plaintiff, v. Margaret B. Backus, as Administratrix, Defendant.

[In each action] Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation.

Bramer v. Bramer
13 A.D.2d 893

Case Details

Name
Bramer v. Bramer
Decision Date
May 11, 1961
Citations

13 A.D.2d 893

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!