277 S.C. 110 282 S.E.2d 863

21579

The STATE, Respondent, v. James Blake RIDDLE, Appellant.

(282 S. E. (2d) 863)

Asst. App. Defender David W. Carpenter, of S. C. Commission of App. Defense, Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Atty. Gen. Lindy P. Funkhouser and State Atty. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., Columbia and Sol. William W. Wilkins, Jr., Greenville, for respondent.

October 5, 1981.

Per Curiam:

The appellant’s probation was revoked following a hearing. He appeals from that revocation.

Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has filed a pro se brief with this Court.

The revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for our review.

We therefore reverse the probation revocation and remand the case for a hearing consistent with the guidelines set forth in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778, 93 S. Ct. 1756, 36 L. Ed. (2d) 656 (1973) and Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. S. 471, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. (2d) 484 (1972). Counsel’s petition to be relieved is denied.

State v. Riddle
277 S.C. 110 282 S.E.2d 863

Case Details

Name
State v. Riddle
Decision Date
Oct 5, 1981
Citations

277 S.C. 110

282 S.E.2d 863

Jurisdiction
South Carolina

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!