Czech v. New York City Transit Authority 297 A.D.2d 700, 747 N.Y.S.2d 389

297 A.D.2d 700 • 747 N.Y.S.2d 389

Maria Czech et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[747 NYS2d 389]

*701The jury award of $1,500,000 to the injured plaintiff for future pain and suffering deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see CPLR 5501 [c]; see generally Van Ness v New York City Tr. Auth., 288 AD2d 374; Gabor v Goolnick, 288 AD2d 432).

The award of $100,000 to the injured plaintiff’s husband, Leslaw Czech, deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see CPLR 5501 [c]; see generally Palmieri v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 221 AD2d 511; Lengares v B & A Warehousing, 216 AD2d 273; Kim v Cohen, 208 AD2d 807).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Czech v. New York City Transit Authority
297 A.D.2d 700 • 747 N.Y.S.2d 389

Case Details

Name
Czech v. New York City Transit Authority
Decision Date
Sep 23, 2002
Citations

297 A.D.2d 700

747 N.Y.S.2d 389

Jurisdiction
New York
Court
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!