123 Ohio St. 3d 445

Turner, Appellant, v. Brunsman, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as Turner v. Brunsman, 123 Ohio St.3d 445, 2009-Ohio-5588.]

*446(No. 2009-1129

Submitted October 20, 2009

Decided October 28, 2009.)

Donald Turner, pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and William H. Lamb, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Donald Turner, for a writ of habeas corpus. Turner’s claim of nonjurisdictional sentencing errors is not cognizable in habeas corpus. See, e.g., Dunn v. Smith, 119 Ohio St.3d 364, 2008-Ohio-4565, 894 N.E.2d 312, ¶ 10. If, as Turner claims, the trial court refuses to issue a revised sentencing entry, he may compel the court to act through an action for a writ of mandamus or a writ of procedendo. Id. at ¶ 9.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Turner v. Brunsman
123 Ohio St. 3d 445

Case Details

Name
Turner v. Brunsman
Decision Date
Oct 28, 2009
Citations

123 Ohio St. 3d 445

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!