After an examination of the record and the assignments of error upon this appeal, the court is of the opinion that there is no merit in any of the points urged by the defendants.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
124 Or. 541 •
264 Pac. 1119
Submitted on brief by appellants and argued by respondent March 7,
affirmed March 13, 1928.
CHARLES SUMNER BEST, Attorney-in-Fact, v. UNITED AUTO INDEMNITY EXCHANGE et al.
(264 Pac. 1119.)
For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. Barnett H. Goldstein and Mr. Thomas Mavmicc.
For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Wilbur, Beckett, Howell & Oppenheimer, with an oral argument by Mr. Ronald L. Reilly.
Best v. United Auto Indemnity Exchange
124 Or. 541 •
264 Pac. 1119
Case Details
124 Or. 541
264 Pac. 1119
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!