381 S.W.3d 395

Eric FURLOW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 97491.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 16, 2012.

Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.

*396Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Furlow appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth' the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Furlow v. State
381 S.W.3d 395

Case Details

Name
Furlow v. State
Decision Date
Oct 16, 2012
Citations

381 S.W.3d 395

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!