152 Ga. 496

Hulse, administrator, et al. v. Starke et al.

Atkinson, J.

1. This is an action at law on a contract, to recover an amount alleged to be due by the defendant upon demands based on performance of the contract by plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals, and no-t the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction. The prayer that the defendant be required to produce certain documents on the trial does not convert the c'ase into an equitable action.

'2. The ease, being of the character indicated in the preceding note, will *497be transferred to the Court of Appeals for decision. See Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538).

No. 2404.

January 12, 1922.

Writ of error; from Bichmond superior court.

Isaac S. Peebles Jr., for plaintiffs in error.

C. II. & B. 8. Cohen, contra.

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Hulse v. Starke
152 Ga. 496

Case Details

Name
Hulse v. Starke
Decision Date
Jan 12, 1922
Citations

152 Ga. 496

Jurisdiction
Georgia

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!