259 A.D.2d 659 685 N.Y.S.2d 629

John E. Fabbricatore, Jr., an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, John Fabbricatore, et al., Respondents, v Lindenhurst Union Free School District, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[685 NYS2d 629]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Lindenhurst Union Free School District appeals, by permission, from so much of a preliminary conference order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated April 21, 1997, as directed it to produce certain records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant Lindenhurst Union Free School District contends that prior orders of the court which denied the plaintiffs’ requests for certain discovery (see, Fabbricatore v Lindenhurst Union Free School Dist., 259 AD2d 660 [decided herewith]), including school records of the defendant Clint Boye, constituted the law of the case, and as such the Supreme *660Court erred in directing it to provide certain discovery in the preliminary conference order dated April 21, 1997. However, an appellate court is not bound by the doctrine of the law of the case and may consider a motion on its merits (see, Detko v McDonald’s Rests., 198 AD2d 208; Zappolo v Putnam Hosp. Ctr., 117 AD2d 597). Under the particular circumstances of this case, the plaintiffs are entitled to the discovery at issue. S. Miller, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Fabbricatore v. Lindenhurst Union Free School District
259 A.D.2d 659 685 N.Y.S.2d 629

Case Details

Name
Fabbricatore v. Lindenhurst Union Free School District
Decision Date
Mar 22, 1999
Citations

259 A.D.2d 659

685 N.Y.S.2d 629

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!