Melville A. Harris, Suing on Behalf of Himself and Other Stockholders of the American Spirits Manufacturing Company, Similarly Situated, Who May Come in and Contribute to the Expenses of This Action Respondent, v. Edson Bradley and Others, Appellants.
Venue—stipulation as to the place of trial, signed by all but one of the defendants —when it does not pi-event a change of venue—effect of an intentional waiver.
Where the defendants in an action comprise a corporation, its directors and officers, a stipulation, entered into by all the defendants, except the corporation, for the purpose of obtaining additional time to answer, providing that the plaintiff may “ serve a notice of trial and file a note of issue for the Special Term of the court for the trial of equity cases, appointed to be held in and for the county of Albany,” on a specified day, will not prevent the court from granting an application made by all the defendants to change the place of trial to the county of New York.
Semble, that it would have been otherwise had the stipulation been made as an intentional waiver of the right to change the place of trial, or if the corporation had joined therein.
Appeal by the defendants, Edson Bradley and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Ulster Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 16th day of July, 1900, denying the defendants’’ motion to change the place of trial from the county of Albany to the county of Hew York.
The action is brought by plaintiff, suing in-his own behalf and in behalf of other stockholders of the American Spirits Manufacturing Company, against the defendants, who are the officers and directors of the Distilling Company of America, and against the Distilling Company of America and the American Spirits Manufacturing Company, substantially, first, to restrain the defendants and their "agents from diverting or using the income or assets of the Aonerican Spirits Manufacturing Company for the benefit and in the interest of the Distilling Company of America; second, to restrain the defendant, the Distilling Company of America, from acquiring and intermeddling with said assets or business; third, that all the contracts between the Distilling Company of America and the American Spirits Manufacturing Company may be decreed to be illegal and *207invalid; fourth, that the defendants may account to the American Spirits Manufacturing Company for the full value of the income and assets of the said company which have been diverted in the interest of the Distilling Company of America.
The defendant, the Distilling Company of America, appeared by its attorneys and answered. The other defendants appeared by their attorneys, and, for the purpose of obtaining additional time to answer, entered into a stipulation which expressed this condition: “ That the issue herein shall remain as of original date, and that the plaintiff may at any time after such date of issue serve a notice of trial and file a note of issue for the Special Term of the court for the trial of equity cases, appointed to he held in and for the county of Albany at the City Hall in the city of Albany, on the 16th day of June, 1900.” These other defendants were the directors and officers of the defendant distilling company.
All the defendants united in this application to remove the place of trial to the county of New York. It appeared that in that county all the transactions occurred out of which the cause of .action has arisen, and substantially all the witnesses for either party live, who do not live without the State. The plaintiff claims no witnesses within the county of Albany, and rests his defense to the motion mainly upon the stipulation of the defendants other than the distilling company as a consent to the trial of the action in Albany county.
Butler, Notman, Joline do Mynderse and Arthur H. Van Brunt, for the appellant, the Distilling Company of America.
Louis Marshall, for the other appellants.
John A. Delehanty, for the respondent.
Smith, J.:
Except for the stipulation signed by the defendants other than the distilling company, the defendants’ motion for the removal of the place of trial would be unanswerable. If this stipulation had been signed by all of the parties defendant, it would be such a consent on their part as would require the court to retain the place of trial in Albany county. Moreover, if the stipulation on the part of the other *208defendants than the distilling company had been made as an intentional waiver of the right to change the place of trial, the relation of those defendants to the distilling company is such that the court might well hold the distilling company to the stipulation of its officers, though not made on its behalf. The holding, however, in this case that such a stipulation is an estoppel against the making of this motion would be rather technical, and, in our judgment, should not be made to the injury of the distilling company,'not a party to the stipulation. All of the defendants unite in this application. As . the estoppel claimed is not broad enough to forbid all the defendants from asking for a change of venue, and as the case seems otherwise to be one clearly calling for such a change, we-think the Special Term erroneously denied the defendants’ motion and that the action should be tried in the county of New York.
The order should, therefore, he reversed and defendants’ motion granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event of the action.
All concurred.
Order reversed, with ten; dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide event.