The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodnoorth, JJ., concur.
13996.
Decided December 13, 1922.
Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Troup superior court — Judge Roop. September 12, 1922.
J. T. Thomasson, for plaintiff in error.
W. Y. Atlcinson, solicitor-general, contra.
The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodnoorth, JJ., concur.
29 Ga. App. 318
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!