179 A.D.2d 471

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ana Morales, Also Known as Ada Sagardia, Appellant.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with her plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of [her] bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Asch, JJ.

People v. Morales
179 A.D.2d 471

Case Details

Name
People v. Morales
Decision Date
Jan 16, 1992
Citations

179 A.D.2d 471

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!