403 S.W.3d 681

Jeffrey Scott MOORE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 98297.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 9, 2013.

Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

*682ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Jeffrey Moore, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Moore v. State
403 S.W.3d 681

Case Details

Name
Moore v. State
Decision Date
Jul 9, 2013
Citations

403 S.W.3d 681

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!