Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Enrique Hernandez-Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir.2000), which held that Appren *318 di v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
169 F. App'x 317
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50781.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Feb. 24, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Hernandez-Rodriguez
169 F. App'x 317
Case Details
169 F. App'x 317
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!