These eases are reported in 76 Texas, 437, 441, and involve here the same questions as those in the case above decided.
The judgments are, severally, Affirmed.
Texas & Pacific Railway v. Griffin 151 U.S. 105, 38 L. Ed. 90, 14 S. Ct. 257, SCDB 1893-085, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2035
151 U.S. 105 •
38 L. Ed. 90 •
14 S. Ct. 257 •
SCDB 1893-085 •
1894 U.S. LEXIS 2035
Texas & Pacific Railway v. Griffin. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Overheiser.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas.
Nos. 136 and 137.
Mr. John F. Dillon, (with whom was Mr. Winslow S. Pierce on the brief,) for plaintiff in error.
Mr. H. J. May, (with whom was Mr. O. A. Culberson and Mr. A. JR. Garland on the brief,) for defendants in error.
Argued with No. 138, ante, 81.
Texas & Pacific Railway v. Griffin
151 U.S. 105 •
38 L. Ed. 90 •
14 S. Ct. 257 •
SCDB 1893-085 •
1894 U.S. LEXIS 2035
Case Details
151 U.S. 105
38 L. Ed. 90
14 S. Ct. 257
SCDB 1893-085
1894 U.S. LEXIS 2035
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!