Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fernando Ibarra-Galindo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
206 F. App'x 337
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando IBARRA-GALINDO, also known as Jesus Perez-Huerta, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50561
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 9, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Ibarra-Galindo
206 F. App'x 337
Case Details
206 F. App'x 337
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!