Both sides, having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the questions of law and fact to the trial justice to determine. We have examined the facts very carefully, and, under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 437, 15 N. E. 705, think the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Railway Co., 127 N. Y. 449. 28 N. E. 394.
35 N.Y.S. 1118
UPTEGROVE et al., Respondents, v. CENTRAL R. CO. OF NEW JERSEY, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
November 26, 1895.)
Action by William E. Uptegrove and Jerome P. Uptegrove against the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey.
De Forest Bros., for appellant. M. P. O’Connor, for respondents.
Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey
35 N.Y.S. 1118
Case Details
35 N.Y.S. 1118
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!