There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict.’ Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. (
9402.
Decided May 17, 1918.
Complaint; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. November 3, 1917.
E. II. Bech, W-. E. Mann, for plaintiff in error.
King & Starr, contra.
There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict.’ Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. (
22 Ga. App. 411
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!