12 N.Y.2d 940

Samuel Atkin et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Argued January 7, 1963;

decided January 23, 1963.

*942Arnold I. Burns, Stanley T. Lesser and Jay D. Fischer for appellants-respondents.

George Zeidenstein, Charles Krupin and Joel M. Handel for respondents-appellants.

Orders affirmed, without costs. The questions certified on the appeal and the cross appeal answered in the affirmative. Ho opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Foster and Scileppi. Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to modify and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that *943under the applicable statute criminal liability is the exclusive redress for its violation (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 275 N. Y. 125; Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N. Y. 274). The question certified on the cross appeal to this court should be answered in the negative.

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
12 N.Y.2d 940

Case Details

Name
Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
Decision Date
Jan 23, 1963
Citations

12 N.Y.2d 940

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!