Automated Services, Inc. v. United States 48 Fed. Cl. 850

48 Fed. Cl. 850

AUTOMATED SERVICES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant.

No. 98-596 C.

United States Court of Federal Claims.

March 19, 2001.

Douglas B. McFadden, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs. John M. Shoreman, of counsel.

Mark A. Melnick, with whom were Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and David M. Cohen, Director, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant.

Margaret J. Porter, Chief Counsel, and Karen E. Schifter, Associate Chief Counsel, Food and Drug Administration, of counsel.

ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs Response to Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff argues that this case should not be dismissed “pending the appeal” in a cognate case, A-1 Amusement Co., et al. v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 63, in which the court dismissed a claim legally identical to the claim pleaded in Count I in this case by Opinion and Order *851dated October 19, 2000.1 Plaintiff challenges the court’s decision in A-l Amusement and urges, in effect, reconsideration of the court’s opinion. Plaintiff declines to address, however, the finality of the judgment in A-1 Amusement pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Court of Federal Claims.2

Because plaintiff offers no other reason why this ease should not be dismissed, the matter of Automated Services, Inc. v. United States, No. 98-596 C, is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Automated Services, Inc. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 850

Case Details

Name
Automated Services, Inc. v. United States
Decision Date
Mar 19, 2001
Citations

48 Fed. Cl. 850

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
United States Court of Federal Claims

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!