71 Or. App. 649 693 P.2d 1319

Argued and submitted December 3, 1984,

reversed and remanded January 16, 1985

BOWERS et ux, Appellants, v. CRONIN et al, Respondents.

(A8401-00467; CA A31662)

693 P2d 1319

Michael J. Martinis, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Webb & Martinis, Salem.

Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Mark H. Wagner and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*650PER CURIAM

In this invasion of privacy case, plaintiffs’ complaint was found insufficient under ORCP 21A(8) and was dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. We hold that the trial court should have given plaintiffs the opportunity to plead further.1 ORCP 25A.

Reversed and remanded.

Bowers v. Cronin
71 Or. App. 649 693 P.2d 1319

Case Details

Name
Bowers v. Cronin
Decision Date
Jan 16, 1985
Citations

71 Or. App. 649

693 P.2d 1319

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!