IN THE MATTER OF: LARRY ANTHONY JOHNSON
No. 8527DC314
(Filed 16 July 1985)
Infants § 20— adjudication of delinquency —necessity for stating standard of proof
The trial court erred in adjudicating respondent a delinquent child without affirmatively stating that the allegation of the juvenile petition had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
APPEAL by respondent from Carpenter, Judge. Order entered 19 November 1984 in District Court, GASTON County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 June 1985.
*160Respondent Larry Anthony Johnson was adjudicated a delinquent child upon a finding by the trial court that he committed the offense of malicious damage to personal property. He was placed on supervised probation for twelve months. From this Order, respondent appealed.
Attorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Associate Attorney General Debra K. Gilchrist, for the State.
Stephen C. Brown for respondent.
ARNOLD, Judge.
By his sole assignment of error, respondent contends that the trial court erred in that it failed to affirmatively state that the allegation of the juvenile petition had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. He argues that the trial judge’s failure to state the standard of proof used in making the determination of delinquency constitutes reversible error. We agree.
G.S. 7A-637 states in relevant part that, “If the judge finds that the allegations in the petition have been proved as provided in G.S. § 7A-635 [beyond a reasonable doubt], he shall so state.” The failure of the trial judge to follow the clear mandate of the statute is error. In re Wade, 67 N.C. App. 708, 313 S.E. 2d 862 (1984).
The decision of the trial court is
Reversed and remanded.
Chief Judge HEDRICK and Judge PARKER concur.