374 S.W.3d 399

Glenn HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 96366.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Aug. 28, 2012.

Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Holt, (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 Movant contends the motion court erred in finding the State met its burden to prove Movant was a prior and persistent offender.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no presidential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) Mo.R.Civ.P.(2012).

Holt v. State
374 S.W.3d 399

Case Details

Name
Holt v. State
Decision Date
Aug 28, 2012
Citations

374 S.W.3d 399

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!