166 F. App'x 90

Barry GREEN, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William K. SUTER, Clerk; Clayton R. Higgins, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-1964.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 31, 2006.

Decided: Feb. 10, 2006.

Barry Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Barry Green, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See *91Green v. Suter, No. CA-05-1674-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Green v. Suter
166 F. App'x 90

Case Details

Name
Green v. Suter
Decision Date
Feb 10, 2006
Citations

166 F. App'x 90

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!