Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Victor H. Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). See United States v. Mata, 491 F.3d 237, 245 (5th Cir.2007) (holding that constitutional challenges to 21 U.S.C. § 851 are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is *358GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
264 F. App'x 357
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor H. GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-51135
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 30, 2008.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Gonzalez
264 F. App'x 357
Case Details
264 F. App'x 357
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!