The order appealed from granting claimant-respondent’s motion to file notice of claim against the City of New York after the expiration of the statutory period unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. (See Matter of Martin v. School Bd. [Long Beach], 301 N. Y. 233, 238, 239, and Matter of Moore v. City of New York, 302 N. Y. 563.) Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
278 A.D. 561
In the Matter of Ruth Nordling, Respondent, against City of New York, Appellant.
Nordling v. City of New York
278 A.D. 561
Case Details
278 A.D. 561
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!