120 Or. App. 224 852 P.2d 200

Submitted on record and briefs March 19,

rules held valid May 12, 1993

LESLIE A. WHALEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

(CA A69239)

852 P2d 200

Leslie A. Whaley, Salem, filed the brief pro se.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*225PER CURIAM

Petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 291-158-005; OAR 291-158-010; OAR 291-158-015 and OAR 291-158-015(10) as not having been adopted in compliance with the notice provision of ORS 183.335(2)(a) and OAR chapter 291, division 1. The notice given complied with the applicable statute and administrative rules.

Rules held valid.

Whaley v. Department of Corrections
120 Or. App. 224 852 P.2d 200

Case Details

Name
Whaley v. Department of Corrections
Decision Date
May 12, 1993
Citations

120 Or. App. 224

852 P.2d 200

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!