Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
The evidence is conflicting. This makes a jury question. There is no error prejudicial to the defendant, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
24 Ala. App. 675 •
138 So. 924
(138 So. 924)
J. W. POWELL v. STATE.
1 Div. 13.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Dec. 15, 1931.
Harry Seale, of Mobile, for appellant.
Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.
Powell v. State
24 Ala. App. 675 •
138 So. 924
Case Details
24 Ala. App. 675
138 So. 924
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!