30 F. App'x 112

O’Mark Shanell BEST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-8100.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.

Decided Feb. 27, 2002.

O’Mark Shanell Best, pro se.

*113Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O’Mark Shanell Best appeals the district court’s order and judgment denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Because Best was sentenced to less than twenty years’ imprisonment, there was no violation under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). See United States v. General, 278 F.3d 389 (4th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Best’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Best v. United States
30 F. App'x 112

Case Details

Name
Best v. United States
Decision Date
Feb 27, 2002
Citations

30 F. App'x 112

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!