*478OPINION.
Respondent has determined a deficiency against petitioner for the taxable year 1947. Petitioner contends that the years 1944'and 1945 are also in issue, respondent having denied petitioner’s claims for refund for the years 1944 and 1945. We have no jurisdiction to grant refunds for 1944 and 1945 because the Commissioner has not determined a deficiency in those years. Section 272, I. R. C.
The only issue here is whether petitioner, beginning with the calendar year 1947, may change from the cash receipts and disbursements method of reporting his income to the farm inventory method without securing the formal permission of the Commissioner to do so.
The petitioner relies upon section 22 (c) and section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding section of Regulations *479111. Applicable provisions of tbe Code and regulations are set forth in the margin.1
On his 1947 income tax return petitioner elected to avail himself of option 1 of the regulations and computed the amount of his net farm profit using inventory values.2 Petitioner’s farm inventory values on hand were $23,130.69 at the beginning of 1947 and $5,800 at the end of the taxable year. For each of the years preceding the taxable year petitioner’s income tax returns were prepared on a cash basis, that is to say, that the amount of farm net profits was computed for each year without using inventory values. As a result of reporting income in this manner, petitioner had already deducted in preceding years the expenses incurred in producing the $23,130.69 farm inventory on hand at the beginning of the taxable year. To this extent petitioner’s 1947 accrual basis tax return is inconsistent with petitioner’s cash basis tax returns for years preceding the taxable year.
Section 29.22 (c)-6 of Eegulations 111 is particularly concerned with this inconsistency. This section of the regulations provides two options to a farmer such as the petitioner who seeks to change from the cash basis to the accrual basis and who has an inventory of *480farm products on hand at the beginning of the year of change. Petitioner elected option 1, printed in the margin.
Adjustment sheets are required of the farmer changing his basis under option 1, the option chosen by petitioner. Petitioner has not fully complied with option 1. As provided therein, he used in 1947, the year of change, his actual opening and closing inventories, and also in his opening inventory he included all farm products (including livestock) whether purchased or raised. This was all right so far as it went. But petitioner failed to comply with the additional requirement of option 1, that the farmer must submit,
* * * with the return for the current taxable year an adjustment sheet for the preceding taxable year based on the inventory method, upon the amount of which adjustment the tax shall be assessed and paid (if any be due) at the rate of tax in effect for that year. * * * [Emphasis added.]
When a taxpayer has filed his return and otherwise complied with the aforesaid requirements of the regulations he has completed the first step in changing his basis of reporting income. After this first step is completed, the Commissioner then must decide whether the adjustment sheet for one year is sufficient to reflect income clearly and if the adjustment sheet for one year is not sufficient to reflect income clearly, adjustments for earlier years may be accepted or required.
Petitioner has not complied with the very first step of the regulations which is when petitioner filed his return for the current taxable year on an accrual basis he must file an adjustment sheet for the prior year, which adjustment sheet shall also be on an accrual basis, and pay the tax shown to be due thereon. Petitioner filed his adjustment sheet for 1946 all right and so far as we can see it was correctly prepared. It showed an additional tax due of $2,328.36. Petitioner did not pay this amount as the regulations require but instead filed adjustment sheets for 1944 and 1945, the net result of which was to show that the Government owed him instead of his owing the Government $2,328.36 as shown by his adjustment sheet for 1946. This, it seems to us, is plainly not in compliance with the regulations. The adjustment sheets filed by petitioner reflect the following:
Tear Deficiency Overpayments
1946_ $2,328.36 _
1945_ _ $2,165. 39
1944_ 457. 00
Total_$2,328.36 $2,622.39
Net overpayment for three years_ $294. 03
Since petitioner failed to follow the procedure outlined in the regulations, he is not entitled in 1947 to change his method of reporting income. Respondent did not err in using the cash basis method of computing petitioner’s net income for 1947, the same method used by *481petitioner in computing the amount of net income reported by him during the taxable years preceding 1947. When the petitioner complies with the applicable regulations he has the right to make the change without securing the formal permission of the Commissioner. Until he does comply with the regulations he has no authority to make such a change.
In support of what he has done petitioner relies upon Kenneth S. Battelle, 9 T. C. 299. In our opinion the Battelle case is distinguishable on its facts. If the interpretation of the regulations which is involved here was present in that case it was not raised as an issue nor discussed by us in our opinion. In that case we said:
The respondent does not challenge the fact that the petitioner’s return clearly and properly reflects his income, nor does he even suggest that the petitioner did not follow precisely respondent’s regulations which set forth the mode and mechanics of the change from a cash basis. * * *
As we have already pointed out such is not the situation here. Petitioner, in our opinion, did not follow the regulations required of him when he undertook to change over from a cash basis to an accrual basis. Until he does do so he cannot make the change.
Eespondent’s determination that petitioner’s net income for the year 1947 must be computed on the same basis as was used by petitioner in preceding years, that is, without using farm inventories is, therefore, sustained.
Decision will he entered for the respondent.