John D. Carson, appointed counsel for Viacheslav Zhukov, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of *887the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Zhukov’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED, and Zhukov’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.
622 F. App'x 886
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Viacheslav ZHUKOV, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-15527
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 12, 2015.
R. Brian Tanner, Carlton R. Bourne, Jr., James D, Durham, Tania D. Groover, Brian T. Rafferty, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Davidson Carson, Jr., John D. Carson, Jr., PC, Savannah, GA, Viacheslav Zhukov, D Ray James CF-Inmate Legal Mail, Folkston, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
United States v. Zhukov
622 F. App'x 886
Case Details
622 F. App'x 886
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!