798 F.3d 1209

Freddy CURIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Amy MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-56949.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 25, 2015.

Jan Burns Norman, Attorney at Law, Davis, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

*1210Freddy Curiel, pro se.

Kyle Niki Shaffer, Deputy Attorney General, Kevin Vienna, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Angela Borzachillo, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Curiel v. Miller
798 F.3d 1209

Case Details

Name
Curiel v. Miller
Decision Date
Aug 25, 2015
Citations

798 F.3d 1209

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!