This court having considered and understood the motions filed by the defendants: (a) to stay the call for a three judge court, (b) tó stay the proceedings in this court, and (c) to dismiss the cause of action, is of the opinion that said motions should be overruled and denied. Southern R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 88 F.Supp. 441; Southern R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 91 F.Supp. 980; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 92 F.Supp. 579; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 93 F.Supp. 544.
The plaintiff, the defendants, the law,, and the material facts in this action are the same as in Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Ala*894bama Public Service Comm.,- D.G, 93 F.Supp. 544.
Findings of Fact
Plaintiff, operating trains 64 and 65 between Selma, Alabama, and Flomaton, Alabama, petitioned the defendant Public Service Commission for authority to discontinue the operation of such trains due to the heavy financial loss occasioned by the operation of these trains, losses which indicate that such service is not substantially used or needed by the public.
2. Plaintiff’s petition was denied by the defendant Public Service Commission and the plaintiff is here seeking injunctive relief.
3. Plaintiff is now, and has been for several years, operating these trains at a heavy financial loss, the deficit running as high as $6,000 per month over the period July 1, 1948 to September 30, 1949.
4. The public use of these trains ha's been small, and there is an absence of necessity on the part of the public for their continued operation.
5. The rural territory which these trains serve is also served by buses, or is on or near improved highways.
6. The order of the defendant Commission is affirmative in nature and is having the practical effect of confiscating plaintiff’s property in violation of the 14£h Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Conclusions of Law
The court adopts herein the conclusions of law as stated in Southern R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 88 F.Supp. 441, and 91 F.Supp. 980; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 92 F.Supp. 579; and, Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Alabama Public Service Comm., D.C., 93 F.Supp. 544.
Opinion
The evidence before this court shows so clearly that the traveling public has, to such a great extent, abandoned the use' of these two local passenger trains, Nos. 64 and 65, as to leave no proper grounds for requiring the plaintiff to continue the operation of these trains at the heavy financial loss the evidence discloses.
When it is clearly shown that the public has discontinued the use of the public utility, and the continued operation is so burdensome, the doctrine of public convenience and necessity does not apply.