MEMORANDUM **
Bernard Dadivas, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection, and denying his family’s derivative applications. We deny the petition for review.
Dadivas failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution tied to a protected ground. The testimony did not establish that the murders of Enrico and Romulo Valisno were based on a protected ground, nor did the testimony indicate that the people responsible for those murders *595would have any reason to target the Dadivas family based on a protected ground. Thus, the BIA’s conclusion that Dadivas was not entitled to asylum or withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence. Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002). Given the speculative nature of Dadivas’ fears, the BIA’s conclusion that Dadivas did not show that it was “more likely than not” that he will be tortured if he returns to the Philippines was also supported by substantial evidence. See Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1048 (9th Cir.2010).
PETITION DENIED.