221 So. 2d 738

Phillip CLEMENTS, Petitioner, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Inc., and the Full Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38035.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 23, 1969.

Edward Schroll, Miami, for petitioner.

Anthony Reinert, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *739there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied. Petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Clements v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
221 So. 2d 738

Case Details

Name
Clements v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Decision Date
Apr 23, 1969
Citations

221 So. 2d 738

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!