31 Misc. 792

Nannie Reed, Respondent, v. William W. Newman, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

James Murphy, for appellant.

George W. Gibbons, for respondent.

Per Guriam.

The complaint is for wages due, and plaintiff must be confined to the period during which she actually rendered services. There can be no recovery for damages for breach *793of contract under such a complaint. Fallon v. Farber, 30 Misc. Rep. 626; 62 N. Y. Supp. 742.

The judgment should, therefore, be reduced to eleven dollars and fifty cents, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegeeicii and O’Gobman,. JJ.

Judgment modified ánd as modified affirmed, without costs.

Reed v. Newman
31 Misc. 792

Case Details

Name
Reed v. Newman
Decision Date
Jun 1, 1900
Citations

31 Misc. 792

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!